Baag gace jo sant radha soami shabad femalae voice
![baag gace jo sant radha soami shabad femalae voice baag gace jo sant radha soami shabad femalae voice](https://i0.wp.com/24.media.tumblr.com/3fd875ac515ee2b769592130e91ac25f/tumblr_mkw3u74snU1qf6tuko1_1280.jpg)
So GSD is not in agreement with the teachings in the books. For instance the story of Kal standing on one leg for x number of jugas. He says those teachings in the books are a metaphor. If HE said “Hey Sangat, I am the supreme Being or Sat Purush, and I have come in his human body to take you back” then I would report that. However, I am simply reporting what the current head of RSSB is stating. In fact in many instances, I agree with Brian, that the teachings as written in the RSSB books do often over-rate the physical form of the guru. The story is not designed to be taken literally otherwise you end up with confusion because you start to think god can be seen and had a form and talks to you.Īdmittedly the RSSB teachings DO contain a lot of mixed messages. These are just metaphors and poetic licence to make a point. Obviously Kabir never met God or argued with him. Kabir was a poet and all poets have “poetic licence” which means that in order to make the point, he says whatever he needs so say. In another place Kabir says he met God on the way to Kaaba, and God started fighting with Kabir, asking him “who says I reside in Kaaba” To add to Brian’s argument, there are even scriptures where, for instance, Kabir says that “Kabir’s mind has become so pure like the river Ganges, that God is running after Kabir, calling his name, asking him to stop” And once you have that insight, all is ONE, so there is no greater or lower. What He DID claim was an insight into the nature of ONENESS. His reply: I am a puppet made of the five elements and I am called Nanak. On the other hand the current guru says “I am just a guide and a teacher” On the one hand the teachings elevate the guru to god status and even beyond god. The radiant form of the guru (meaning, a supernatural form) guides the disciple through higher regions of reality all the way to Sach Khand, or "heaven." -Brian Hinesīrian refers to the contradiction in what the current guru is saying. Those teachings say that the guru is greater than God, because the guru takes souls back to God, being God in Human Form. Anyway, read on for the most recent interchange between Osho Robbins and the RSSB guru. I'd find Dhillon to be more believable if he simply said that the traditional teachings are wrong. Even more, those teachings speak of the Perfect Living Master, Dhillon being the current occupant of that title. He doesn't claim to be any sort of divine being, yet he refers people to the traditional RSSB teachings - which DO say that the guru is divine. So it seems to me that the current RSSB guru is trying to have it both ways. The radiant form of the guru (meaning, a supernatural form) guides the disciple through higher regions of reality all the way to Sach Khand, or "heaven." On the other hand, Dhillon said the guru is only a guide and a teacher.īut that isn't what the traditional RSSB teachings proclaim, including the "scriptures" - if that is taken to mean the books describing the teachings of the preceding gurus. On the one hand, Dhillon told Robbins that what's important is what the previous RSSB gurus said and what the scriptures say. Thus I was struck by a seeming contradiction in what Robbins says below. Since I was a member of RSSB for thirty-five years, I'm familiar with the organization's traditional teachings and books. So below is what Robbins shared in several email messages. But I realize that many people who visit this blog are interested in what Dhillon has to say. Osho Robbins is a frequent commenter on this blog who enjoys asking the guru of Radha Soami Satsang Beas (RSSB), Gurinder Singh Dhillon, probing questions.